10 Most Hated College Teams

 So Uncoached.com released a list of the 10 most hated teams in sports. The list included three college teams; Ohio State football, Duke men's basketball, and Notre Dame football. It got me thinking about the college programs that people around the country really, really dislike and I ranked them. In addition to the three mentioned above, I added seven more.  

10) UConn women's basketball: The only women's team on this list!!! Nobody likes a team that has dominated for so long. 90 wins in a row? 90 FRIGGIN' wins in a row!!! Amazing, yes. But it just made you feel good to see them lose and cry, and pout, and be like 'We're UConn, what is this feeling of losing?'  And you know, there's just something about Geno Auriemma that rubs people the wrong way. I loved it when Pat Summit was winning titles, but Auriemma? The guy looks angry when his team wins by 30. 

Lane Kiffin. My blood boils. 

9)  Boise State football: I know there are many people who are fans of this perennial BCS crasher. But how many other people out there cry foul? Here's to all the people who ask "How would they do in a power conference? How many games would they lose in the SEC?" To each his own, but Boise State really started the conversation for the importance of strength of schedule in determining the top 2 teams in the BCS national championship game. For the record, I'm a fan of the Broncos. 

8) Southern Cal football: Two words: Lane Kiffin. Every time they lost last year just felt so good, didn't it?

7) Miami, Fla., football: The hatred thrown at the program stems from its renegade days in the 1980's. Some people suggest the program is still living in the past, but if that's the case, then so are all the haters who can't get enough of calling Miami "Thug U." So many people were calling for the Death Penalty liberally following the Shapiro scandal. The sanctions await. 

6) Kentucky men's basketball: John Calipari is the nation's best recruiter, but he hasn't won over many fans with his crop of one-and-done freshman sensations. His reliance on young talent paid off spectacularly with last year's national title, but some basketball purists can't stand the idea of "renting" players for one year, unless of course it's your team cutting down the nets at the end of the year. 

5) Tennessee football: You fire Phil Fulmer who was good at the beginning and bad at the end, kind of like an all-you-can-eat buffet. You gave Lane Kiffin a shot. Then he leaves you, your fans go all apocalyptic, but it's OK because you hired Derek Dooley. Plus, you gave Lane Kiffin a shot. 

Lord Voldemort, er, Saban

4) Alabama football: Roll Tide! Alabama was a broken program just six years ago. Enter Lord Saban and college football's craziest, most rabid fans have reason to get all smug again. They also claim a crazy amount of national titles, some of which are totally unjustified, most of which, begrudgingly, are completely legitimate.

3) Notre Dame football: All the history, nostalgia, and legacy from the Four Horsemen to Lou Holtz. No program has more lore than the Fighting Irish, and it's a bit annoying. Sure it's a historic program, but it's no different now than any other major college football program. Plus, there's the resentment of having their own contract with NBC and holding out of a conference. I predict the ACC is in your near future Notre Dame. 

2) Ohio State football: Only 15 years ago Ohio State was a respectable program cheered on by many people outside the state of Michigan. Then came Jim Tressel, who made the program a Big 10 powerhouse, but it came with his horrible sweater vest. Deep down you just knew Tressel was somehow...off. Then came the embarrassing losses to two SEC teams in BCS title games. The Suckeyes, I mean, Buckeyes have yet to live  those losses down. 

Cameron Indoor, home of the Dukies

1) Duke men's basketball: Blue bloods. Players on Duke teams have been called sell-outs, but all they do is keep winning ACC titles on a regular basis and reach Final Fours for Hall of Fame coach Mike Krzyzewski. After Duke won the 2010 championship people were literally outraged that they had beaten Butler. You ever seen an indignant Digger Phelps? I have. Their fans do tend to get annoying, but it's the only arena in all of sports where I catch myself paying more attention to the crowd than to the game. Is that a bad thing or a good thing?

Job Security of College Football Coaches; Introduction of "Win Gain"

In doing some research of college football coaches, I came across an interesting stat suggesting the "fireability" of a coach through four years. From 2000-2010, there were 113 coaches hired at BCS conference schools and at five additional schools; Notre Dame, BYU, Utah, TCU, and Hawaii. I looked at the first four years because that is typically the amount of time that a school will give a coach to prove their worth. In fact, to find how many times a university will give its coach four years, we reduced the 113 hires by the number of coaches who left for another job before their fourth year at a school, willingly resigned prior to their fourth year, and active coaches that have not or are not yet preparing for their fourth season at a school. The research indicated that 85 coaches did not leave for another job, are at least entering their fourth year at a school, or were fired before their fourth year. Of those 85 coaches, a total of 72 -- or 84.7 percent -- of their schools allowed them to enter their fourth year.

Stanford's Jim Harbaugh compiled the highest "net win gain."

Now, I came across a stat I'll call "win gain." The "win gain" takes a look at the records of five seasons, the first record is the record the departing coach left an incoming coach. The next four records were a coach's first four seasons. Some coaches did not last four years, or even three years. So a coach with four seasons would have had five seasons of comparison, a coach with three seasons would have had four years of comparison, a coach with two years at a school would have three years of comparison, and a coach with one year at a school would have two years of comparison. The net win gain suggests that in the first four years an incoming coach is measured against the final record of his predecessor and by the consistency and success of his own tenure. A coach can build a lot of goodwill in his first four years at a school, and based on the previous stat it shows that the majority of schools are willing to give coaches the four years to do that.

Let's take a look at former Minnesota coach Tim Brewster as an example. The departing coach, Glen Mason, left his final season at Minnesota with a 6-7 record. Brewster finished his first season with a 1-11 record, leaving him with a net "win gain" of -5. Ouch. Now, in Brewster's second season, his team finished with a 7-6 record, leaving him with a "win gain" from the previous year of +6. After two seasons, Brewster had a "net win gain" of +1. Brewster's third year he went 6-7, and then in his fourth year he was fired midseason after tumbling through a 1-6 record. Brewster coached into his fourth year, giving us five years of comparison that includes his predecessor's final season, which I will now list: 6-7, 1-11, 7-6, 6-7, 1-6. Brewster's net "win gain" in the four seasons he coached was -5.

Four important disclosures, 1) I did not include the records of interim coaches who only coached a few games of a season or one bowl game, but I did include the team's final record as the basis of comparison for the first season of an incoming coach, regardless of the fact that two coaches were in charge of a team during one season. (ex: Brewster went 1-6, then interim coach Jeff Horton went 2-3, so the comparison for incoming coach Jerry Kill will be a 3-9 season.) 2) Losses are irrelevant in this calculation. What we are looking for is an increase in wins, which is actually favorable to a coach since schools have now moved to a 12-game schedule, thus giving coaches more opportunities to win more games. 3) In my opinion, you can only really fairly use the net win gain after a coach's fourth season, though we did extend it for coaches that have coached through their third season for data-gathering purposes. 4) The data provided gives a snapshot of today entering the 2011 season, not of any trends from previous seasons.

What I found was startling. Though I'm certain that this calculation has many flaws, it indicated which coaches were likely to be fired after four seasons, and which ones were likely to keep their jobs. The overwhelming majority of coaches with a positive net win gain were retained, while a slight majority of coaches with a negative net win gain were fired. And coaches that had a neutral net win gain, or a 0, had a good chance of keeping their jobs. Now you would say that this makes sense, why would a school keep a losing coach? And it's obvious that a school would keep a winning coach. But that's not necessarily the case. For example, let's take a look at Vanderbilt coach Bobby Johnson who coached for eight seasons at Vanderbilt.

Since Johnson coached for eight seasons, we have five seasons of comparison for the net win gain, the first being the record left to him by his predecessor. Comparing his predecessor's last season with Johnson's first four years we have: 2-9, 2-10, 2-10, 2-9, 5-6. His net win gain after four seasons was +3. He kept his job and went on to coach four more years before retiring just before the 2010 season. You say, that's Vanderbilt, they don't really care about football there so Johnson was given more time to turn things around. Besides, he probably saved his job because he had a much better fourth year, which is absolutely true. The importance of a fourth year cannot be underestimated.

Rich Rodriguez could have benefitted from a 4th year

But let's go look at a school that really does care about its program, Michigan. Rich Rodriguez coached at Michigan for three seasons before being fired, all while showing progress in the win column in his three years there. Let's calculate his net win gain through three seasons: 9-4, 3-9, 5-7, 7-6, net win gain of -2. After three seasons Rodriguez was fired, and I would argue that had he won nine games in his third season, despite all the controversy surrounding him, he would have kept his job, or that he would have needed to win at least nine games in his fourth season if he had any shot of keeping his job. But Rodriguez did not win nine games in his third season, and he wasn't given the chance to enter a fourth season, but we do know where his net win gain stood after three seasons.

There were 82 coaches hired between 2000 and 2008 that have coached at least three seasons at their schools. Of those coaches, we could exclude Les Miles (OK State), Jim Harbaugh (Stanford), Mark Dantonio (Cincinnati), Brian Kelly (Cincinnati), and Bobby Petrino (Louisville) because they did not keep their jobs by accepting other jobs after either their third or fourth seasons at their school. But it is safe to assume that each one would have been back at their post if they had the desire to do so. Each one was extremely successful at their school and had a positive net win gain at the time they left their school. So we will stick with a sample of 82 coaches who coached at least three seasons at their school regardless of whether or not they left for another job.

Did Ty Willingham deserve a 4th year at Notre Dame?

Of the 46 coaches with a positive net win gain after either their third or fourth seasons, all have kept their jobs with the LONE exception of Ty Willingham during his tenure at Notre Dame. Keep in mind, this does not mean the coach was not fired after their fifth or subsequent seasons, but that the university allowed them to go beyond a fourth year. Coaches on this list include (Sylvester Croom (5 total seasons, 17-30 in first four seasons), Rich Brooks (7 total seasons, 17-30 first four seasons), Bobby Johnson (8 total seasons, 11-35 first four seasons), and Charlie Weis (5 total seasons, 29-21 first four seasons). Former North Carolina coach Butch Davis, though fired just before the beginning of his fifth season, does not count against this list because he was not fired for on-the-field performance. After three seasons at Notre Dame, Willingham's net win gain was +1, compared to Weis' +2 after four seasons.

Of the 13 coaches with a negative net win gain after four seasons of coaching, six kept their jobs [Les Miles (LSU), Larry Coker (Miami), Bill Doba (Washington St.), Dennis Erickson (Arizona St.), Dan Hawkins (Colorado), and Gary Patterson (TCU)]. It should be noted that Miles and Coker had won national titles within their tenures, and Erickson had won two national titles while at Miami. Doba and Hawkins were fired after their fifth seasons, Coker was fired after six seasons, Miles has been a controversial coach at LSU, Erickson should be considered on the hot seat entering this season, and Patterson has become one of the best coaches in the country.

Of the 12 coaches with a negative net win gain after three seasons of coaching, five kept their jobs [Dabo Swinney (Clemson), Paul Johnson (Georgia Tech), Paul Wulff (Washington St.), Rick Neuheisel (UCLA), and Greg McMackin (Hawaii)]. Those that lost their jobs are Ed Orgeron (Ole Miss.), Ron Zook (Florida), Gerry Di Nardo (Indiana), Bobby Williams (Michigan St.), Rich Rodriguez (Michigan), Buddy Teevens (Stanford), and Steve Kragthorpe (Louisville).


Of the 10 coaches with a neutral net win gain after four seasons, seven kept their jobs [Jim Tressel, Bret Bielema, Ralph Friedgen, John Bunting, Chan Gailey, Karl Dorrell, and Rich Rodriguez (West Virginia)] The three that were fired were Randy Shannon, Bill Lynch, and John L. Smith. 

There was one coach, Ron Prince (Kansas St.), with a neutral net win gain after three seasons, and he was fired after the 2008 season.

Which coaches had the highest net win gain after four seasons? Jim Harbaugh (Stanford) +11, Nick Saban (LSU) +10, Pete Carroll (USC) +8, Jeff Tedford (Cal) +7, Mark Dantonio (Michigan St.) +7, Sylvester Croom (Miss. St.) +6, Urban Meyer (Florida) +6, and Tom O'Brien (NC State) +6.

Which coaches had the lowest net win gain after three or four seasons? Steve Kragthorpe (Louisville) -8, Bobby Williams (Michigan St.) -7, Tim Brewster (Minnesota) -5, Buddy Teevens (Stanford) -5, Bill Doba (Washington St.) -4, Paul Wulff (Washington St.) -4, Bill Callahan (Nebraska) -4, Ted Roof (Duke) -4, Dan Hawkins (Colorado) -4, and very surprisingly Gary Patterson (TCU) -5. Patterson's negative win gain is the result of having an inaugural 6-6 season after a 10-2 season by Dennis Franchione, and following up an 11-2 season in his third year with a disastrous 5-6 season his fourth year.

Disturbingly, where 46 coaches had a positive net win gain after their third or fourth seasons, only Willingham was not retained. Of the 11 coaches with a neutral net win gain after three or four seasons, only four were not retained, including Miami's Shannon and Kansas State's Prince. All the coaches mentioned above are African-American. It's not to say that their firings didn't have some merit, but their firings are also contradictory to what the numbers say.

I totally made up this "win gain" stat and it may very well be that it has no significant bearing on anything, but it is interesting to see where the exceptions lie and where some trends emerge. I know for sure that I am not the first to think of the concept of a "win gain" or to apply such a concept over a prescribed amount of time (in this case 3 and 4 years). Perhaps athletic departments take this idea into account, whether subconsciously or not, when deciding the fate of their coach, or not. It'll be interesting to track this little stat as more coaches finish up their third and fourth seasons.