Saturday, August 27, 2011

Coaches on the Hot Seat Using Win Gain Differential

Earlier this summer I introduced a stat called the win gain. Essentially, it takes a look at a coach's first four years as well as the last year of his predecessor. For instance, in order to calculate Urban Meyer's win gain at Florida, we would take the Gators' record in Ron Zook's last season, and then we would look at the total wins in each of Meyer's first four seasons. Zook's final season yielded a 7-6 season, after which Meyer was able to reel off 9-3, 13-1, 9-4, and 13-1 seasons in his first four years. After four seasons, Meyer had a positive win gain of 6 - a very good number.

The hottest seat in America belongs to WSU's Paul Wulff.
In a previous post, I established that a positive win gain of any sort almost automatically insured a coach would keep their job for at least another season. A neutral win gain and coaches were still likely to keep their jobs, and a negative win gain after four years meant that a coach was likely to lose their job.

Which coaches entering their fourth year in a BCS conference are on the hot seat, and what records must they reach in order to keep their jobs? First, let's take a look at the guys that appear to be safe. Including Hawaii, which made a BCS Bowl appearance in the 2008 Sugar Bowl, there are 11 coaches entering their fourth seasons among BCS teams. The coaches that are safe are Bobby Petrino, Houston Nutt, Bo Pelini, Mike Sherman, Art Briles, and David Cutcliffe. What would it take for any of these coaches to be fired? Let's take a look.

Bobby Petrino is coming off a 10-win season and Sugar Bowl appearance and has a positive win gain of 2. A seven-win season could have some Razorback fans angry given their high expectations and could be enough to force Petrino out of town. Petrino has Arkansas on the upswing and many would not be shocked if they are in the hunt for the SEC West title late in the season.

Houston Nutt is coming off a disastrous 4-8 season, but his first two seasons at Mississippi included two 9-4 campaigns. If Nutt can only muster a three-win season, he may be packing his bags out of Mississippi. However, his team is expected to improve upon last year's miserable record.

Bo Pelini has gone 9-4, 10-4, and 10-4 in his first three seasons. He has a positive win gain of five, so it would take about a five-win season to get him out of town. Not gonna happen.

Mike Sherman is coming off a successful 9-4 season and Texas A&M is considered by many a dark horse candidate to win the Big 12, and even make a run at the national title. Sherman has a positive win gain of 2, so barring a season where he only wins six games, he should be safe.

Art Briles has brought optimism to the Baylor program by recruiting blue-chip players like quarterback Robert Griffin. After posting consecutive 4-8 seasons in his first two years, Briles finally broke out with a 7-6 campaign in 2010. This year, his Baylor squad is expected to be a middle-of-the pack team capable of competing with almost everyone on its schedule. Unless Baylor reverts to another four-win season, Briles should come back to the lead an emerging Baylor program.

David Cutcliffe inherited a one-win program at Duke and has since gone 4-8, 5-7, and 3-9. He has a positive win gain of 2, so unless he posts a one-win season, which he won't, he'll be safe to coach at Duke for another season and hopefully take the perennially lowly Duke football team to a bowl game.

We now come to the five coaches that are on the hot seat heading into their fourth season. You might be surprised to see the first coach on this list.

Paul Johnson brought the option attack from Navy to Georgia Tech and was widely successful in his first season, capturing coach of the year honors for the Yellow Jackets. In his second season, his team won the ACC Championship. Then came the third season and an ugly 6-7 campaign. After three seasons, Johnson has a negative win gain of -1. It is very likely that another six-win campaign at Georgia Tech, along with recent NCAA sanctions, would be enough for Johnson's exit. Johnson needs at least a seven-win season to make an argument for keeping his job.

Dabo Swinney is actually only entering his third full season as head coach, after taking over Tommy Bowden midseason in 2008 and going 4-3 the rest of the way. In his second season, he led the Tigers to the ACC Championship game where Clemson lost to Georgia Tech. But last season the Tigers reverted to 6-7, despite a very talented roster. There's a lot of pressure this season for Swinney to make Clemson competitive again, and he needs an eight-win season to keep his job.

Greg McMackin is coming off a 10-win season at Hawaii, so he should be a lock to keep his job after his fourth season, right? Wrong. His first two seasons, McMackin went 7-7 and 6-7, before his 10-game breakthrough. McMackin needs to show that a 10-win season was no fluke and also at least another seven-win season to keep his job.

Rick Neuheisel has gone 4-8, 7-6, and 4-8 at UCLA and was expected to compete with neighboring Southern Cal. Ouch, that hasn't even come close to happening. He needs to win at least seven games -- prior to a bowl game -- to have a good shot at keeping his job.

Paul Wulff has gone 2-11, 1-11, and 2-10 in three seasons at Washington St. I don't see any silver lining here, but if he can somehow win at least six games to make a case for keeping his job. It will take a seven-win season to absolutely keep his job. But even that might be asking for too much.

Among coaches entering their fifth season, Nick Saban, Mark Dantonio, and Tom O'Brien are safe. But Dennis Erickson at Arizona St. needs at least eight wins -- prior to a bowl game -- given ASU's high expectations this season and the fact that the Erickson era has been a major disappointment following a 10-win inaugural season.

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Will Miami Scandal Signal the End of ACC Football?

Was this guy's stolen money worth it Miami? 
Ever since I heard about the Miami allegations, I've been in a daze. The worst part will be the wait to find out what happens. It's been more than a year since the allegations at North Carolina, and they still don't know what kind of sanctions they're going to face, but they suspended a ton of players, Butch Davis was fired, and their athletic director is going to step down. In other words, a lot of bad stuff has happened at UNC, and this Miami scandal is much bigger than North Carolina's. The Shapiro story doesn't so much show a renegade program, but a program that purposely looked the other way, and that's bad enough. One of my friends thinks Miami is going to get off easier than Southern Cal, but I think he's in denial. The process needs to be played out, but I'll come out and say I believe about 80 percent of what Shapiro is saying, and even if only a quarter of what he said is true, it's still the worst story about a program in more than 15 years (Alabama).

What I think will happen: 2 year bowl ban, about 35 scholarships reduced over a 3-year period, and a ban from TV for one year. I hope it's not that bad, but a part of me thinks the sanctions could be much worse. If I were working at Miami, I'd suggest voluntarily giving up going to a bowl game this year so that future football players aren't penalized. The biggest tragedy of all? Just as Shapiro was out of the picture, and the Hurricanes landed a great coach in Al Golden, and a lot of optimism was building around the program, none of it will matter. I think Golden sticks around for one season, proves his worth this season, and then leaves for Penn St. when Joe Paterno retires after this season. Maybe I'm just being pessimistic, but if I am, it's a result of the hangover I'm still feeling from reading the Yahoo! story. It's enough to make any college football fan sick to their stomach, and I'm not naive enough to think things like this aren't happening all over the country. Let me put it this way, does your school have millionaire alumni with outsized egos with a large interest in athletics? Yes, it does. You should be worried too.

Now to the question I asked at the beginning. Will this Miami scandal signal the end of ACC football? I watched the 30 for 30 documentary on Southern Methodist and everyone mentioned how the SMU scandal had the effect of destroying the Southwest Conference. If Miami is penalized the way I think it's going to be, and North Carolina also gets hit hard, then we're talking about a conference with some severe limitations. Throw in the fact that Florida St. and Virginia Tech have been mentioned as possible candidates to join the SEC, and the ACC looks like a radically different conference.

There has been speculation about the six current BCS conferences combining into four super conferences, with the Big East and Big XII being dismantled. But the Miami situation puts the ACC in a very fragile situation. It could be that the Big XII, with Oklahoma, Texas, up-and-comers Oklahoma St., and middle-tier Missouri and Texas Tech survives to expand to 16 teams, and the ACC and Big East are forced to join one of the four remaining conferences. Imagine if Florida St. joins the SEC, the banner program for the ACC would be Virginia Tech, and then who? A rebuilding Miami would be years away from being competitive again, so the second banner team would be Georgia Tech? Maryland? Boston College? And who would they pick up? USF? Pittsburgh? Syracuse? In other words, the ACC would be in the same category as the Big East, by far the two weakest conferences of the six BCS conferences.

The repercussions for Miami will last a long time. I think it's going to be a much harsher repeat of the mid-90's when the NCAA imposed a one-year bowl ban and a reduction of 24 scholarships over two years. Who's to blame? First and foremost, the Miami administration for chasing money and enabling a booster like Nevin Shapiro, then Shapiro for just coming into the consciousness of Miami athletics, and then all the players who knowingly broke the rules and disregarded Randy Shannon's warnings to stay away from Shapiro. The NCAA is going to put the "U" in for extended nap time, let's just see where the dominoes fall for the rest of the teams affected by Miami's inability to monitor itself.

Thursday, August 11, 2011

AP Preseason vs. Final Polls

When it comes to picking a champion prior to a season beginning, it makes sense to stick with the prohibitive favorite. But if one is trying to pick a national champion, the AP Poll can lend a good framework with some exceptions. Take a look at the preseason Top 10 poll from the 2010 season. There were two teams, Florida and Texas, that started the season ranked in the Top 5 but that did not even finish in the Top 25. Texas finished with a 5-7 record. Nebraska, Virginia Tech, and Iowa finished outside of the Top 10, with Virginia Tech finishing 16th, Nebraska 20th, and Iowa outside of the rankings. So which teams managed to finish in the Top 10 that started in the AP Top 10? Alabama (1st to 10th), Ohio State (2nd to 5th), Boise State (3rd to 9th), TCU (6th to 2nd), and Oklahoma (7th to 6th). Two of the teams that started the season in the Top 10 finished the season in the Top 5. 

AP 2010 Preseason Top 10 Poll
1Alabama (54)0-01491
2Ohio State (3)0-01400
3Boise State (1)0-01336
4Florida0-01237
5Texas (1)0-01223
6TCU0-01160
7Oklahoma (1)0-01104
8Nebraska0-01033
9Iowa0-01007
10Virginia Tech0-0973
   
AP 2010 Final Top 10 Poll 

1Auburn (56)14-01472
2TCU (3)13-01392
3Oregon12-11379
4Stanford12-11300
5Ohio State12-11220
6Oklahoma12-21108
7Wisconsin11-21055
8LSU11-21051
9Boise State12-11031
10Alabama10-3961


Now let's look at where three teams that finished in the Top 5 that did not start in the Top 10, started in the preseason rankings. Auburn won the national championship and was ranked 22nd in the AP Preseason, Oregon finished third and started 11th, and Stanford finished 4th while starting unranked.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarkably, out of the teams that started in the Top 10 in the 2009 season, seven finished in the Top 10. And of the teams to finish in the Top 5, four of them started in the Top 10.


AP 2009 Preseason Top 10 Poll

1Florida (58)0-01498
2Texas (2)0-01424
3Oklahoma0-01370
4USC0-01313
5Alabama0-01156
6Ohio State0-01113
7Virginia Tech0-01054
8Ole Miss0-01047
9Oklahoma State0-0989
9Penn State0-0989



AP 2009 Final Top 10 Poll

1Alabama (60)14-01500
2Texas13-11399
3Florida13-11370
4Boise State14-01366
5Ohio State11-21224
6TCU12-11163
7Iowa11-21126
8Cincinnati12-11060
9Penn State11-21016
10Virginia Tech10-3953

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of the teams to begin in the Top 10 in 2008, only four finished in the Top 10. Three of the teams in the final Top 5 began the season in the Top 10. For the most part it seems as if the AP Poll does a good job of pegging a few elite teams, but misses on surprise teams and other teams that are simply overrated. Of the past three AP Polls, two teams from the Top 4 have played in the BCS Championship Game, meaning that in the past three years you had a greater chance of looking outside of the Top 4 to find a national title game participant than in looking in the Top 4. However, look at the Top 5, and in the past three years, 4 of the six participants have started in the Top 5. 


AP 2008 Preseason Top 10 Poll

1Georgia (22)0-01528
2Ohio State (21)0-01506
3USC (12)0-01490
4Oklahoma (4)0-01444
5Florida (6)0-01415
6Missouri0-01266
7LSU0-01135
8West Virginia0-01116
9Clemson0-01105
10Auburn0-0968



AP 2008 Final Top 10 Poll

1Florida (48)13-11606
2Utah (16)13-01519
3USC (1)12-11481
4Texas12-11478
5Oklahoma12-21391
6Alabama12-21264
7TCU11-21193
8Penn State11-21153
9Ohio State10-31013
10Oregon10-3997